Health Consequence Scoring for Chemical Contaminants in Animal Feed Karen Ekelman, Ph.D. AFSS Public Meeting September 12, 2006 |  |
Slide 2 Outline - Review and Background
- Health Consequence Scoring for Chemical Feed Contaminants
- Acute Adverse Effects
- Severity Scores
- Potency Scores
- Examples
- Chronic Adverse Effects
- Severity Scores
- Potency Scores
- Examples
|  |
Slide 3 Review: AFSS Relative Risk Model - Goal: The AFSS Relative Risk Model is a tool for ranking relative risks of feed contaminants to aid FDA in setting priorities for allocating its resources in a risk-based manner
- Relative Risk Score = Health Consequence Score (HCS) x Exposure Score (ES)
- Health Consequence Score (HCS) = Severity Score (SS) x Potency Score (PS)
|  |
Slide 4 Review: AFSS Relative Risk Model - Reminders:
- The list of potentially harmful feed contaminants should not be considered to be the definitive list of feed contaminants that pose a significant risk to animal or human health
- Some items on the list may turn out to pose very low relative risks to animal or human health
- Some items may need to be added to the list
- Health Consequence Scores for contaminants are not Relative Risk Scores (Exposure is missing)
|  |
Slide 5 Review: AFSS Relative Risk Model - Health Consequence Scores (HCS) for chemical and biological contaminants will be developed for:
- Appropriate species:
- Food-producing animals such as cattle, swine and chickens
- Pets such as dogs and cats
- Humans
- Specific exposure scenarios:
- Acute and chronic exposures for chemicals
- Acute exposures for biological contaminants
|  |
Slide 6 Chemicals: Acute Adverse Effects |  |
Slide 7 Chemicals: Acute Adverse Effects - Acute adverse effects occur following a single or short-term exposure to a toxic dose of a chemical
- Acute adverse effects may be:
- Easily identified by trained or untrained observers (death, seizures, vomiting), or
- Identified only after laboratory examination of affected tissues and organs
- Acute adverse effects may occur
- Immediately after exposure, or
- Be delayed
|  |
Slide 8 - Chemicals: Acute Adverse Effects
- Data on acute adverse effects come from:
- Results of accidental or deliberate poisonings in humans and animals (anecdotal reports)
- Data from acute toxicity tests conducted on animals
|  |
Slide 9 Chemicals: Acute Adverse Effects - Most acute toxicity test data on chemicals come from the LD50 test (LD = Lethal Dose)
- LD50 is the amount of a chemical given in a single dose that causes the death of 50% of a group of test animals; can be measured or extrapolated
- Most are conducted in rodents, so results need to be extrapolated to other species
- Oral LD50 results are most relevant
- LD50 is usually measured in mg of the chemical per kilogram of body weight of the test animal
|  |
Slide 10 Chemicals: Acute Adverse Effects - Acute Health Consequence Score =
- Acute Severity Score x Acute Potency Score
- Acute Severity Scoring
- The Acute Severity Scores for chemicals are numerical scores assigned to a chemical based on the types of effects observed in relevant acute toxicity studies or data from other sources
- The Acute Severity Score for a chemical is based on the most severe (worst) effect observed in all studies used to assess the acute toxicity of the chemical
|  |
Slide 11 Chemicals: Acute Adverse Effects Severity Scoring for Acute Adverse Effects | Acutea | Acute Adverse Effects |
|---|
| 1 | No adverse effects |
|---|
| 2 | Adverse effects other than those listed below |
|---|
| 3 | Neurological or neurobehavioral adverse effects |
|---|
| 10 | Death |
|---|
a Weighting of scores can be changed |  |
Slide 12 Chemicals: Acute Adverse Effects - Acute Health Consequence Score =
- Acute Severity Score x Acute Potency Score
- Acute Potency Scoring
- Acute Potency Scores are numerical scores assigned to a chemical based on the measured or extrapolated doses that killed 50% of the test animals after administration of a single dose of the chemical (e.g. the LD50 value)
- For chemicals with more than one reported LD50 value, the lowest value is used to determine the Acute Potency Score for the chemical
- Acute Potency Scores may need to be adjusted for known species differences in sensitivity to a chemical
|  |
Slide 13 Chemicals: Acute Adverse Effects Acute Chemical Potency Scores are assigned based on three 1/LD50 ranges: | Scores | Ranges: 1/LD50 Values |
|---|
| 1 | Lowest 1/LD50 values (lowest potency) |
|---|
| 3 | Mid-range 1/LD50 values |
|---|
| 10 | Highest 1/LD50 values (highest potency) |
|---|
a Weighting of scores can be changed |  |
Slide 14 Chemicals: Acute Adverse Effects - Acute Potency Scoring (cont.)
- To incorporate information from acute toxicity studies other than LD50 reports, a weight-of-the-evidence approach will be used to assign the study results to the appropriate potency category, using:
- Information for chemicals with related chemical and physical properties
- Information for chemicals with similar toxicity profiles
|  |
Slide 15 Example: Health Consequence Scores for Acute Adverse Effects of 16 Chemical Contaminants |  |
Slide 16 Example: Severity Scoring for Acute Adverse Effects | Scoresa | Acute Adverse Effects |
|---|
| 1 | No adverse effects |
|---|
| 2 | Adverse effects other than those listed below |
|---|
| 3 | Neurological or neurobehavioral adverse effects |
|---|
| 10 | Death |
|---|
a Weighting of scores can be changed |  |
Slide 17 Example: Potency Scoring for Acute Adverse Effects | Scoresa | Ranges: 1/LD50 Values (& no. of chemicals per range) |
|---|
| 1 | 0.0002 – 0.0083 (4 chemicals) |
|---|
| 3 | 0.00113 – 0.00441 (6 chemicals) |
|---|
| 10 | 0.0122 – 0.2 (6 chemicals) |
|---|
a Weighting of scores can be changed |  |
Slide 18 Acute HCS: 16 Chemicals Health Consequence Scoring (HCS) for Acute Adverse Effects | Chemical | SS | LD50 | 1/LD50 | PS | SS x PS = HCS |
|---|
| Lindane | 10 | 76 | 0.0132 | 10 | 100 |
|---|
| Aflatoxin B1 | 10 | 5 | 0.2 | 1 | 10 |
|---|
| Chlorpyrifos | 10 | 82 | 0.0122 | 1 | 10 |
|---|
| Carbaryl | 10 | 230 | 0.0043 | 3 | 30 |
|---|
|  |
Slide 19 Acute HCS: 16 Chemicals Health Consequence Scoring (HCS) for Acute Adverse Effects | Chemical | SS | LD50 | 1/LD50 | PS | SS x PS = HCS |
|---|
| Malathion | 10 | 885 | 0.00113 | 3 | 30 |
|---|
| Iprodione | 10 | 3500 | 2.86E-4 | 1 | 10 |
|---|
| Diazinon | 10 | 300 | 0.0033 | 3 | 30 |
|---|
| Methoxychlor | 10 | 5000 | 0.0002 | 1 | 10 |
|---|
|  |
Slide 20 Acute HCS: 16 Chemicals Health Consequence Scoring (HCS) for Acute Adverse Effects | Chemical | SS | LD50 | 1/LD50 | PS | SS x PS = HCS |
|---|
| Dicofol | 10 | 575 | 0.00174 | 3 | 30 |
|---|
| Lead | 10 | 1200 | 8.33E-4 | 1 | 10 |
|---|
| Ethoxyquin | 10 | 800 | 0.00125 | 3 | 30 |
|---|
| Fumonisin B1 & B2 | 10 | 2730 | 3.66E-4 | 1 | 10 |
|---|
|  |
Slide 21 Health Consequence Scoring (HCS) for Acute Adverse Effects | Chemical | SS | LD50 | 1/LD50 | PS | SS x PS = HCS |
|---|
| Dieldrin | 10 | 38 | 0.0263 | 10 | 100 |
|---|
| Ethion | 10 | 27 | 0.0370 | 10 | 100 |
|---|
| Imazilil | 10 | 227 | 0.00441 | 3 | 30 |
|---|
| Aldrin | 10 | 39 | 0.0256 | 1 | 100 |
|---|
|  |
Slide 22 Example: Ranking of 16 Chemicals by Acute Health Consequence Scores (HCS) | HCS | Chemicals |
|---|
| 10 | Lead, Fumonisin B1 & B2, Iprodione, Methoxychlor, Aflatoxin B1, Chlorpyrifos |
|---|
| 30 | Imazilil, Dicofol, Ethoxyquin, Malathion, Diazinon, Carbaryl |
|---|
| 100 | Aldrin, Ethion, Dieldrin, Lindane |
|---|
|  |
Slide 23 Chemicals: Chronic Adverse Effects |  |
Slide 24 Chemicals: Chronic Adverse Effects - Chronic toxicity occurs when a toxic dose of a chemical is consumed for a significant portion of the subject’s lifetime
- Chronic toxicity data can come from:
- Long-term studies in humans (epidemiological studies)
- Long-term studies in laboratory animals
|  |
Slide 25 Chemicals: Chronic Adverse Effects - The following set of studies is usually used to determine the chronic toxicity of a chemical:
- Chronic toxicity studies
- Carcinogenicity studies
- Reproductive toxicity studies
- Developmental toxicity studies
- Fewer or shorter studies on a chemical result in greater uncertainty in estimating its chronic toxicity
|  |
Slide 26 Chemicals: Chronic Adverse Effects - Chronic Health Consequence Score =
- Chronic Severity Score x Chronic Potency Score
- Chronic Severity Scoring
- The Chronic Severity Score is a numerical score assigned to a chemical based on the types of effects observed in chronic toxicity studies or from other data sources
|  |
Slide 27 Chemicals: Chronic Adverse Effects | Chronic Severity Scoresa | Chronic Adverse Effects |
|---|
| 1 | No adverse effects |
|---|
| 2 | Adverse effects other than those listed below |
|---|
| 3 | Neurological or neurobehavioral adverse effects |
|---|
| 4 | Reproductive or developmental adverse effects w/o maternal toxicity |
|---|
| 5 | Cancer |
|---|
| 10 | Death |
|---|
a Weighting of scores can be changed |  |
Slide 28 Chemicals: Chronic Adverse Effects - Chronic Health Consequence Score =
- Chronic Severity Score x Chronic Potency Score
- Chronic Potency Scoring for effects other than cancer
- A Chronic Potency Score is assigned to a chemical based on the most severe (worst) effect observed in all studies used to assess the chronic toxicity of the chemical
- Basis for the Chronic Potency Score is an estimate of an Acceptable Exposure Level (AEL) for each chemical contaminant
|  |
Slide 29 Chemicals: Chronic Adverse Effects - The AEL (Acceptable Exposure Level) is an estimate of the amount of a chemical that can be ingested daily over a lifetime without an appreciable risk of adverse effects
- AEL is analogous to EPA’s reference dose (RfD) and FDA’s Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI)
- The AEL is usually expressed on a body weight basis (e.g., mg/kg body weight/day)
- AEL is determined according to standard methods for deriving RfDs and ADIs
|  |
Slide 30 Chemicals: Chronic Adverse Effects - To calculate an AEL (Acceptable Exposure Level):
- Determine the NOEL (No Observed Effect Level) or NOAEL (No Observed Adverse Effect Level) for each study used to determine the chronic toxicity of the chemical
- Divide each NOEL or NOAEL by appropriate safety factors (SF); this number is an AEL
- The lowest AEL calculated from studies used to determine the chronic toxicity of a chemical is the AEL assigned to the chemical
|  |
Slide 31 Chemicals: Chronic Adverse Effects Safety Factors | Factorsa | Purpose |
|---|
| 10 | Intra-species variability |
|---|
| 10 | Sub-chronic to chronic |
|---|
| 10 | Severity of effects (developmental and reproductive only) |
|---|
| 10 | Inter-species extrapolation |
|---|
a Other factors can be used, especially if they were used by federal regulatory agencies or other authoritative scientific bodies in their evaluations of the subject chemical |  |
Slide 32 Chemicals: Chronic Adverse Effects - The Chronic Potency Score for non-cancer endpoints is determined by placing the inverse of the AELs (1/AEL) for all chemical contaminants on a comparative scale
- Scale in then divided into 3 categories
- Each category is assigned a Chronic Potency Score
- Acute Potency Scores may need to be adjusted for known species differences in sensitivity to a chemical
|  |
Slide 33 Chemicals: Chronic Adverse Effects | Chronic Potency Scores | Ranges: 1/AEL |
|---|
| 1 | Lowest 1/AELs (least potent) |
|---|
| 3 | Mid-range 1/AELs |
|---|
| 10 | Highest 1/AELs (most potent) |
|---|
aWeighting of scores can be changed |  |
Slide 34 Chemicals: Chronic Effects - Chronic Potency Scoring for cancer effects
- One measure of carcinogenic potency is the estimated dose associated with a one in one million lifetime risk of cancer (Lifetime Cancer Risk)
- For cancer-causing chemicals with estimated one in one million lifetime risk doses, those estimates will be used to determine the Chronic Potency Score using a scale similar to the one established for the non-cancer chronic effects
|  |
Slide 35 Chemicals: Chronic Adverse Effects | Chronic Potency Scores for Cancer | Ranges: 1/LCR Doses (1/Lifetime Cancer Risk Doses) |
|---|
| 1 | Low 1/LCR doses (least potent) |
|---|
| 3 | Mid-range 1/LCR doses |
|---|
| 10 | High 1/LCR doses (most potent) |
|---|
aWeighting of scores can be changed |  |
Slide 36 Chemicals: Chronic Adverse Effects - Chronic Potency Scoring for cancer effects (cont.)
- For cancer-causing chemicals without estimates of a one in one million risk dose, a weight-of-the-evidence approach will be used to assign the chemical to the appropriate potency category, based on
- Analyses by various regulatory bodies
- Information on chemicals with related chemical, physical or toxicological properties
|  |
Slide 37 Example: Health Consequence Scores for Chronic, Non-Cancer Adverse Effects of 14 Pesticides |  |
Slide 38 Example: Severity Scoring | Chronic Severity Scoresa | Chronic Adverse Effects |
|---|
| 1 | No adverse effects |
|---|
| 2 | Adverse effects other than those listed below |
|---|
| 3 | Neurological or neurobehavioral adverse effects |
|---|
| 4 | Reproductive or developmental adverse effects w/o maternal toxicity |
|---|
| 5 | Cancer |
|---|
| 10 | Death |
|---|
aWeighting of scores can be changed |  |
Slide 39 Example: Potency Scoring a Weighting of scores can be changed | Chronic Potency Scores | 1/AEL Ranges (& no. of pesticides in range) |
|---|
| 1 | 10 – 208 (7 pesticides) |
|---|
| 3 | 1000 -- 2000 (4 pesticides) |
|---|
| 10 | 5000 – 20000 (3 pesticides) |
|---|
|  |
Slide 40 Example: 14 Pesticides (1) Health Consequence Scoring (HCS) for Chronic Adverse Effects | Pesticide | SS | AEL | 1/AEL | PS | SS x PS = HCS |
|---|
| Iprodione | 2 | 0.025 | 40 | 1 | 2 x 1 = 2 |
|---|
| Lindane | 3 | 0.00481 | 208 | 1 | 3 x 1 = 3 |
|---|
| Malathion | 4 | 40.023 | 43 | 1 | 4 x 1 = 4 |
|---|
| Pirimiphos-methyl | 4 | 40.005 | 200 | 1 | 4 x 1 = 4 |
|---|
|  |
Slide 41 Example: 14 Pesticides (2) Health Consequence Scoring (HCS) for Chronic Adverse Effects | Pesticide | SS | AEL | 1/AEL | PS | SS x PS = HCS |
|---|
| Methoxychlor | 4 | 0.01 | 100 | 1 | 4 x 1 = 4 |
|---|
| Carbaryl | 4 | 0.0005 | 2000 | 3 | 4 x 3 = 12 |
|---|
| Chlorpyrifos | 4 | 0.0001 | 10000 | 10 | 4 x 10 = 40 |
|---|
| Aldrin | 5 | 0.0005 | 2000 | 3 | 5 x 3 = 15 |
|---|
| Diazinon | 2 | 0.0002 | 5000 | 3 | 2 x 3 = 6 |
|---|
|  |
Slide 42 Example: 14 Pesticides (3) Health Consequence Scoring (HCS) for Chronic Adverse Effects | Pesticide | SS | AEL | 1/AEL | PS | SS x PS = HCS |
|---|
| Dieldrin | 4 | 0.00005 | 20000 | 10 | 4 x 10 = 40 |
|---|
| Ethion | 4 | 0.0005 | 2000 | 3 | 4 x 3 = 12 |
|---|
| Imazilil | 2 | 0.0125 | 80 | 1 | 2 x 1 = 2 |
|---|
| Carboxin | 10 | 0.1 | 10 | 1 | 10 x 1 = 10 |
|---|
| Chlordane | 10 | 0.0005 | 2000 | 3 | 10 x 3 = 30 |
|---|
|  |
Slide 43 Example: Ranking of 14 Pesticides by Chronic, Non-Cancer Health Consequence Scores (HCS) | HCS | Pesticides |
|---|
| 2 | Imazilil, Iprodione |
|---|
| 3 | Lindane |
|---|
| 4 | Methoxychlor, Malathion, Pyrimiphos-methyl |
|---|
| 6 | Diazinon |
|---|
| 10 | Carboxin |
|---|
| 12 | Ethion, Carbaryl |
|---|
| 15 | Aldrin |
|---|
| 30 | Chlordane |
|---|
| 40 | Dieldrin, Chlorpyrifos |
|---|
|  |
Slide 44 Chemical and Physical Contaminants: Summary - Health Consequence Score (HCS) x Exposure Score (ES) = Relative Risk Score
- HCS = Severity Score x Potency Score
- SS = Severity Score
- Acute Effects SS for Chemicals
- Chronic Effects SS for Chemicals
- PS = Potency Score
- Acute Effects PS for Chemicals
- Chronic Effects PS for Chemicals
- Need to develop a weighting scheme for Acute HCS, Non-cancer Chronic HCS and Cancer HSC scores
|  |